Adam Grant on Interviewing to Hire Trailblazers, Nonconformists, and Originals

Ask candidates to share a concrete instance where they challenged conventional wisdom; demand specifics on the outcome, the timeline, the learning.

Frame the questions to surface impact across cultures, teams, work results; look for evidence that they can persuade others, move from idea to action, sustain momentum.

постоянно, having, культуры, опыта, иллюстраций, первой, нанять, столкнулся, одна, ваши, ситуации, важно, будут, ожидают, готовы, положение, быстрее, способность, работы, решить, найти, первопроходцев.

Use real-world tasks that reveal execution capability; require candidates to outline steps, tradeoffs, measurable impact; avoid vague pledges.

Choose those who demonstrate speed of learning; readiness to experiment; capacity to translate ideas into visible results under pressure.

How to Hire Trailblazers, Nonconformists, and Originals: Practical Interview Strategies

Begin with a single, practical guideline: align selection conversations to trends in the field and ask candidates to describe five situations where they pushed past conventional thinking to deliver measurable impact.

Frame a real work challenge and require a brief proposal that outlines a better idea, the trade-offs, and the expected solutions and impact.

Strengthen collaboration signals by requesting the names of teammates, their roles, and the concrete contributions that led to success.

Use prompts that focus on obstacles and decisions around a project; explain how they would handle this situation if constraints changed.

Demand data-backed claims: specify which metrics, customers or users, and time or cost savings, and explain how progress was tracked.

Ground questions with external references: bockarchiveorg and wharton frameworks help validate claims and anticipate counterfactuals.

Evaluate with a five-criterion rubric: curiosity, resilience, communication, collaboration, and learning–these are the true signals of a capable innovator.

Note: build a fair process with diverse assessors and a clear audit trail; rely on verifiable data rather than charisma.

Identify originality signals in storytelling and examples

Recommendation: For a candidate, map stories to three originality signals: a purpose-driven move that rewrites a challenge; a measurable impact beyond official duties; a unique synthesis reframing a problem as opportunity. In practice, observe how the candidate describes the move; whether the path used scarce resources; whether tradeoffs are named. можете документировать эти сигналы в ваших заметках; можно ориентироваться на реальные показатели; можно сравнивать между проектами.

Signals to listen for include a crisp arc; a tangible obstacle; a decisive pivot. например, the кандидат describes how they introduced a оригинальное approach that yielded quantified results. Observed phrases include a несколько concrete steps; a clear threshold; a named tradeoff. This pattern signals a musician-like control of tempo in human-centered projects; storytelling rhythm resembles a музыкальных cadence across milestones.

Prompts for verification: например, “Describe a moment when you shifted a process beyond должности, delivering measurable outcomes.” Request specifics on users reached, time saved, costs reduced. Wharton exercises provide a benchmark; use wharton-style scenarios to compare the narration against a clear benchmark to gauge originality; focus on the move; naming the tradeoffs; имен stakeholders include sponsors, users.

Evaluation rubric: assign scores for each signal on a 0–3 scale; weigh move 40%; impact 40%; synthesis 20%. When data is missing, request evidence; relatable examples from real roles matter. If the candidate provides multiple references from teammates, credibility increases; больше evidence strengthens selection.

Implementation tip: create a one-page profile for each candidate reflecting three signals; store in a shared workspace during the interview; use a lightweight rubric across users to rate clarity of the move; impact; synthesis. This helps вашей компании quickly identify originality signals; ensure repeatability across роли; translates to tangible outcomes for the компанию.

Craft prompts that reveal nonconformist problem-solving

Recommendation: Craft prompts that force disclosure of nonconformist problem-solving by asking for a situation where a routine solution failed; follow with the candidate’s unconventional route.

Use structured prompts that require comparing two paths: the usual approach; radical pivot. This reveals how candidates grow, how they handle ambiguity, how they communicate risk to human teammates, plus alignment with your culture.

Observe whether they grow in responsibility; track impact.

Prompt 1: Describe a situation where a routine solution failed; present an alternative route you would take.

Prompt 2: For кандидатам, provide a two-path breakdown: conventional approach; radical pivot. Explain why pivot could yield better outcomes.

Prompt 3: Show how a radical pivot would be tested using real users; specify metrics, edge cases, learning loops to grow the team’s capability.

Prompt 4: Provide иллюстраций of the nonconformist route; attach a brief rationale for why this path fits diverse cultures across teams.

Usage tip: Cite examples from bockarchiveorg; compare with your own hunch; reflect on possible biases; center human judgment over automation.

Culture alignment: For вашей авиакомпании, such minds grow capabilities to adapt to turbulence. They also share perspectives with diverse teams; model iterative learning.

Implementation note: Integrate prompts into the selection process; align with rubrics that rate curiosity, resilience, willingness to test unconventional ideas.

Such prompts facilitate growth.

Validate ideas with real-world, impact-focused tasks

Start with a concrete, time-bound experiment tied to outcomes you value; youre testing a single assumption: the feature delivers measurable benefit to a defined group; specify real-world context, user action, expected impact. This подход relies on a rapid build-measure-learn loop, from a lean playbook; oracle-style feedback guides the next moves. Nightingale-inspired data discipline helps you collect data ярко–distinguishing signal from noise. Эта методика keeps the team focused on measurable change, not vanity metrics.

Three real tasks anchor the test: a micro-activation in the product; a workflow tweak reducing time; a short feedback sprint to gauge смысл. Laszlo from customer success observes behavior; the team captures impact, crafts concrete next steps. Notes tracked at bockarchiveorg provide an auditable trail; эти insights guide the next iteration. From this практики, you refine делающееся предложение, сбываясь к цели быстрее и точнее.

Timeframe guidance centers on rapid feedback cycles: 7–14 days per task, with milestones that expose expectations clearly. Metrics include time-to-value, activation rate, retention, revenue uplift; costs per outcome stay within budget. Decision rules specify: uplifts meeting or exceeding threshold yield a Go, otherwise a pivot occurs, scope adjusts, повторный запуск планируется. This approach minimizes риск, подталкивая toward meaningful, сыграющие роль результаты.

Assess collaboration and influence without stifling individuality

Recommendation: Start with a lightweight, transparent framework measuring influence via outcomes; peer feedback quality; content impact; cross‑functional adoption; preserve оригинальное мышление within company culture. This approach illuminates how люди contribute without suppressing individuality.

1. Signal clarity: define 3 metrics – cross‑functional outcomes, content impact, sustained influence on teammates; include примечание for the кандидат to демонстрировать искал вызов in prior work; invite a 1‑page portfolio from wharton context to showcase approach.
2. Portfolio exercise: кандидат submits content sample from prior work showing problem framing; collaborator roles; measurable outcomes; evidence of оригинальное подход; assess рискованно tolerance by examining chosen risks; instruct respondents to briefly describe lessons learned using content.
3. Peer conversations: conduct brief dialogues with 2–3 сотрудников to observe listening; probing assumptions; respectful pushback; capture notes (примечание) on culture alignment; observe communication styles across teams.
4. Culture readiness: assess whether компания готовы embrace unconventional styles; quantify readiness using a simple rubric; map критерии к стратегическим целям; identify where поддержка from leadership is necessary to refine practices.
5. Decision rubric: apply scoring focusing on оригинальное мышление; measurable impact; cross‑team influence; long‑term достижения; ensure readiness to modify processes to accommodate diverse styles.

Use bias checks and structured rubrics for fair evaluation

Recommendation: Implement a bias-check protocol across resume review; screen; interview stages; apply a structured rubric to evaluate each candidate consistently; use multiple independent raters; calibrate scores before openings; maintain an audit trail for transparency. For кандидатам, this protocol improves consistency; reduces noise; speeds decision making.

• Blinded resume screening minimizes bias for кандидатам; having objective metrics such as impact; scope; learning velocity; use a 1–5 rubric with explicit anchors; calibration time limited to 20 minutes per batch; одно baseline for comparison.
• Structured rubrics define dimensions: execution potential; learning capacity; collaboration; resilience; customer focus; each dimension includes concrete anchors such as revenue impact; user adoption; cycle time; this clarifies expectations.
• Calibration sessions before interviews align judge judgments; compare sample responses; discuss discrepancies; use a reference set of exemplars from первых hiring rounds; первопроходцев; successful customer-facing roles.
• Documentation; transparency: record scores; rationales; bias flags; publish aggregated results for equal treatment; review interview content quality; from time to time update rubrics based on outcomes.
• Impact measurement after hiring: track performance relative to rubric scores; correlate with early milestones; identify gaps in evaluation processes; use customer outcomes as validation; nightingale metrics quantify long-term impact.
• Continuous improvement culture: quarterly rubric reviews; solicit interviewer feedback; adjust language to reduce ambiguity; from time to time pilot new prompts to test reliability; publish learnings for better candidate experience.

This approach yields measurable improvements in hiring quality; it scales to первых pioneers in компании; time saved; value delivered to customer; nightingale metrics track long-term impact; not replacing intuition, rather providing decision makers with a clear, reproducible path. This aligns with вашей смысла, focusing on measurable outcomes.