Blog
Don’t Play with Dead Snakes – Essential Management LessonsDon’t Play with Dead Snakes – Essential Management Lessons">

Don’t Play with Dead Snakes – Essential Management Lessons

podle 
Ivan Иванов
13 minutes read
Blog
Prosinec 22, 2025

Identify the spot where dead snakes appear in your facilities, and drop risky handling. Always wear PPE and use a dedicated container when moving remains; dispose through approved channels. This standard protects everyone on site and supports a good safety culture.

Implement a quarterly safety cycle to monitor elements of risk: inspection routines, stocked care items, signage, and emergency contacts. In your presentation to staff, clearly present steps and assign owners. Different departments play distinct roles, but the process remains the same for all ones across the organization.

From a business and financial perspective, quantify the cost of mishandling dead snakes: downtime, insurance premiums, and labor reallocation. This has been a reality for teams that do not invest in training. Identify cost centers, drop unneeded expenses, and channel funds to training, tools, and safe disposal. This approach keeps the ship moving and reduces risk to your earth-based facilities.

Train with practical drills, not slides. A hands-on cycle helps identify gaps in care and spot weaknesses in the protocol. Each session should end with a short Q&A to confirm that everyone can identify the disposal path and pick the right container. Capture answers in a simple checklist to keep everyone aligned.

Review quarterly outcomes and share the results with the team. A concise presentation of metrics–response time, disposal accuracy, and near-misses–helps leadership see value and keep the focus on prevention rather than reaction.

Don’t Play with Dead Snakes: A Practical Management Outline

Move immediately to isolate the area, open the incident log, and initiate a structured diagnostic. Assign two teams: one to secure the site and one to document the plan. Identify the spot, warn others, and youre taking decisive action now.

Adopt a three-phase cycle: assess, respond, review. In assessing, study the scene, record the number of potential risk points, and просмотреть all access routes. Then implement controls: remove hazards, добавить clear signage and barriers, and rotate staff to reduce exposure.

Benchmark with competitors and others to identify best practices. Engage third-party reviewers to validate your protocol. Ask: what were the near-misses, which controls cut exposure, and how often should inspections occur? The answers guide your risk profile and the next iteration.

Turn strategy into a toolkit: products like signage, quick-release barriers, PPE kits, and inspection cards. Build a simple digital checklist, open a shared dashboard, and просмотреть logs for trends. Track a number of metrics to demonstrate progress and добавить new controls as needed.

Define roles: team lead, safety observer, operations liaison. Each person spot hazards and move fast to contain risk. Theyre accountable for timely decisions and for asking the right questions. Use loops of feedback: after each shift, teams review, then adjust, then repeat.

Measure outcomes: incident cycle time, inspections per shift, mean time to containment, and task fulfillment rate. Set a target number of days without a new incident, and publish results to everyone weekly to keep transparency.

In practice, this outline becomes a living cycle within your teams: repeat the process, refine loops, and keep everyone aligned. The turned data informs decisions and actions, helping you move from reaction to proactive control and delivering measurable fulfillment for all stakeholders.

Don’t Play with Dead Snakes: Management Lessons, Team Building, and Actionable Guidance for Projects

Lead with a direct plan: three-week sprints, a single owner for each risk, and a dead-snakes checklist for reducing repetition of failure.

Direct teams to operate with a lightweight model: three cross-functional groups, a shared backlog already, and clear interfaces between teams to scale output without overlap.

Use a tactical approach to identify dead snakes early: run small experiments against core hypotheses; capture number of experiments begun, and collect answers quickly.

Between reviews, seize opportunity: prefer faster feedback loops to improve outcomes, and use data from each iteration to take the next viable step without heavy process.

Document lessons to break repetition and move faster: show what worked, who leads the effort, and how this translates into reduced risk.

Hack inefficiencies with a crisp backlog grooming ritual and automated checks that catch regressions before they merge.

Identify Early Indicators of Dead Snakes in a Project

Identify Early Indicators of Dead Snakes in a Project

Start with a concrete health-check: track five signals every sprint and escalate when two indicate a blocked path. Focus on a tactical lens and drive actionable adjustments within 48 hours.

Indicators to monitor include recurring blockers that cross teams, misaligned priorities, shrinking input loops, rising rework, and milestones slipping. Ensure clear ownership and document decisions so the team can adjust without delay.

Data sources form a lightweight framework: issue tracker, sprint reviews, release notes, and user input. The отслеживающих across teams should update daily, and a concise dashboard provides real-time visibility for managers and practitioners.

Governance should encourage candid discussions and timely escalation. If a pattern persists, allocate additional support to the project lead role and align on a shared purpose. careeradvice tips emphasize coaching and clear roles to sustain momentum.

Operational steps: define five signals, assign owners, and set a 48-hour response. добавить a standing health note to the backlog, and отслеживающих teams update the dashboard weekly. Review outcomes in the retro, focusing on concrete actions rather than intentions.

Decide to Kill: Criteria, Approvals, and Stakeholder Alignment

Decide to Kill: Criteria, Approvals, and Stakeholder Alignment

Set a kill decision rule: if risk, cost, and impact to customers exceed predefined thresholds within the scope, kill the initiative. This is the best practical advice for agile teams, offering a concrete edge when problems arise and decisions must be fast. Define a fixed window–no endless debates–and ensure the decision reflects what the customers will see. This approach works well in practice.

What to measure? Value delivered, problems encountered, safety/compliance, and total means to the company. Use a simple scorecard: 0-3 for impact, probability, and effort; document the case and the rationale. Having a clear metric helps engineers and product leads align on the what and why, and it avoids drift between teams. In a real case, if the cost of continued work outweighs the benefits, the decision to kill becomes the logical next step. Involving the lead and role owners ensures a balanced view; the ones who see the front line, the ones who see the backend, and the ones who see the business implications must all weigh in. The companys all-hands may need a quick update if the scope shifts dramatically. Also, netscape should be treated as a red flag, and we should clarify whats in scope and what should be dropped. If you encounter resistance, document the reasons and seek quick advice from the team. Encounter

Approvals should be streamlined: product owner, sponsor, and engineering lead review the kill signal; if needed, route to the companys all-hands or executive sponsor. Use a title for the decision, such as “Kill: Go/No-Go,” and attach the date, criteria, and the people involved. Provide больше clarity to all-hands to minimize misinterpretation. The advice should be concrete: what is being stopped, what the next steps are, and what it means for scope and timelines. Include the best-case, worst-case, and a clear contingency plan to avoid confusion.

Stakeholder alignment must be explicit: communicate the decision to customers and to the internal teams; align on the plan to sunset features, reallocate resources, and update the roadmap. In one instance, the lead kept the companys roadmap honest by benchmarking against the scope; the engineers saw that continuing would hinder progress in the next sprint, so the kill decision aligned all departments and reduced wasted effort. The role of the all-hands is to confirm alignment and surface any hidden problems which may block finalization. Between teams, coordinate handoffs and ensure the whats next is clear to everyone.

Practical tips for speed: maintain a lightweight decision log, run short syncs under 20 minutes, capture the what, why, and next steps; avoid rehashing the same debates. Ensure the decision gets communicated in the next retro or all-hands update. If a project carries agile title, keep naming simple to avoid confusion; the means of decision should be documented in the backlog so the company can learn for the future.

Common pitfalls: theyll try to delay with political tactics; call this out and bypass the stall by citing the pre-set criteria and linking approvals to the role of the accountable lead. Ensure the means of decision are transparent and that customers see the impact; otherwise, problems recur in the next cycle. The best teams treat killing as a strategic option and learn from each encounter to improve the next project.

Build Your Dead Snake Hunters: Roles, Hiring, and Onboarding

Appoint an Onboarding Lead who must own the ramp plan and track daily progress for the first 30 days. They should coordinate training, safety checks, and feedback loops to turn a growing team into a capable, consistent unit.

Lead Hunter: Own risk evaluation, escalation, and after-action reviews. They define milestones, ensure alignment with safety standards, and prevent wrong decisions by surfacing issues early. Use real-world scenarios to test decision-making and safety compliance.

Field Technician: Executes field tasks, records encounter outcomes, and follows standardized checklists. They must report anomalies daily and contribute to a knowledge base that scales with the business. This role should prefer reproducible processes over ad-hoc fixes.

Safety & Compliance Officer: Maintains policy docs, training materials, and audit logs. They ensure repeatable processes and protect long-term viability. They oversee anything that could kill momentum if ignored and keep escalation paths clear.

Analytics & Insights Specialist: Builds dashboards, tracks KPIs like ramp time, incident rate, and first-encounter quality score; delivers quarterly insights that guide improvements. They could run controlled experiments to validate process changes and share impact across teams.

Hiring and Onboarding Cadence: Implement a four-stage hiring flow: sourcing, screening, practical assessment, and culture fit. Use real-world simulations tied to daily tasks; move candidates through the funnel quickly to capture the opportunity before competitors do. The goal is to pick the best fit for long-term success and business momentum.

Onboarding Program: Design a 14-day core program with daily check-ins, followed by a 30-60-90 day ramp and quarterly performance reviews. Provide a mentor, a starter playbook, and a quarterly hack session to surface new ideas. If theyre engaged, teams move faster and stay aligned. When teams face setbacks, adjust the ramp plan quickly and communicate changes. Maintain a constant feedback loop and a clear flow from learning to delivering value, because care for people directly boosts retention and performance.

Reallocate Resources Quickly: Pivot Tactics After a Dead Snake Is Found

Start by reallocating 30–40% of non-critical capacity from lower-impact work to root-cause analysis and rapid mitigation within 24 hours after the dead snake is found. This early shift prevents scattered effort and speeds up the pivot. Define the objective: know the root cause, measure customer impact, and ship a focused fix or pivot. Create a cross-functional squad with clear responsibility: product, engineering, data, and customer support. Emphasize teamwork and maintain a tight flow with a 2x daily stand-up to track progress and unblock blockers. Use market signals to decide where to focus and align with best practices from faang cadence. This is really about moving faster and reducing friction.

Within 48 hours, assemble a tactical backlog that prioritizes what matters most. The thinking is to find the highest-leverage tasks, cut vanity work, and accelerate decision-making. Set clear metrics: defect rate, time to first user feedback, and customer satisfaction. The squad can pivot in smaller waves, scale the solution, and keep above-water services intact. This approach boosts productivity and speeds the ship date of the pivot. We cant afford long experiments; use data to validate every move and adjust quickly.

Keep the cadence constant for quarterly planning cycles. Maintain visibility into outcomes, share progress across the team, and reinforce responsibility for each action. After the initial push, review what worked and what didn’t, then adjust the plan to stay faster and more predictable, чтобы stay aligned with quarterly targets. For benchmarking, consider faang teams but adapt practices that fit your market and team size. Use feedback loops to validate assumptions and inform the next iteration.

Scenario Timeframe Departments Involved Resource Shift Expected Outcome Key Risks
Root cause fix 0–48 h Engineering, QA, Product 40% Stabilize, reduce customer impact, stop bleed Over-commitment, scope creep
Pivot to new feature 2–5 days Product, Design, Data 25% New capability aligned to market need Misalignment with signals
Operational efficiency 1–2 weeks Ops, Eng, CS 15% Maintain productivity during pivot Resourcing bottlenecks
Scale back fallout 2–4 weeks All teams 0–10% Stabilize and resume original roadmap Residual risk

Post-Mortems that Drive Change: Documenting Causes and Preventive Actions

Within 48 hours after a failure, run a structured post-mortem with a clear objective, assign owners, and publish the preventive plan to stop recurrence in upcoming projects.

  1. Capture scope and impact: log the failure type, affected services, user impact, and revenue implications. Use a concise timeline to keep meetings focused and outcomes measurable.
  2. Identify the источник of the problem: collect logs, traces, metrics, and interview the on-call engineers, designers, and product owners. Ask targeted questions to surface both symptoms and underlying causes.
  3. Map the sequence of events: assemble a simple timeline, flag decisions that worsened the issue, and note where early signals appeared. Use this to differentiate symptoms from root causes.
  4. Apply a root-cause method: run 5 Whys or a fault-tree analysis, then call out direct factors that can be controlled by teams (process, tooling, monitoring) and those that require broader changes (culture, governance).
  5. Define preventive actions with owners and due dates: for every root cause, pick concrete steps, deliverables, and owners. Include both quick wins and long-term fixes, with milestones that teams can track in loops and in meetings.
  6. Document decisions and change requests: compile a case file that links to the code, configurations, and dnanexus pipelines used. Highlight what was started, what needs review, and what must be paused until validated.
  7. Share learnings across teams: craft a compact summary for designers, developers, and operations. Add a short section called advice for future incidents, and добавь a list of suggested changes to templates and runbooks.
  8. Incorporate into culture and governance: connect findings to the culture of continuous improvement. Show how lessons influence design reviews, release criteria, and funding for preventive actions that protect revenue streams.
  9. Close the loop with measurable follow-ups: schedule constant check-ins, track progress against owners, and update dashboards. Ensure teams meet to review execution status and adjust as needed.
  10. Publish and standardize: distribute a reader-friendly post-mortem to stakeholders, attach the action plan, and reference where to find the full logs and the source material. Keep the format consistent so teams can reuse it for future incidents.

This approach turns incidents into practical changes: it connects the failure to concrete projects, guides designers and engineers on what to ask for, and creates a transparent path from incident to improvement. By treating post-mortems as living documents, organizations move from reactive fixes to proactive prevention, strengthening culture, and sustaining revenue growth.

Komentáře

Zanechat komentář

Váš komentář

Vaše jméno

E-mail