Treats customer acquisition expenses as predictable, asset-like investments, funding them through structured, revenue-based financing separate from equity
The Core Thesis
Late-stage tech companies underinvest in growth
- Pressured to show short-term EBITDA
- Constrained by cash reserves
- Ignore high ROI opportunities in CAC
Solution: Use EBITCAC, not EBITDA
“Think of CAC as CapEx for tech.”
Outcome: Drives better long-term equity value
Why EBITDA Fails Tech
EBITDA misses the point in tech:
- No interest → low/no debt
- No tax → operating losses
- No assets → minimal D&A
EBITDA ≠ actual cash generation in tech
✔️ EBITCAC reflects:
- Recurring revenue
- Cash generation after CAC ROI
CAC as CapEx
Industrial Companies:
- Invest in machines (CapEx)
- Assets = financing = long-term payoff
Tech Companies:
- Invest in CAC (ads, sales, marketing)
- But expense it on P&L
Pranav Singhvi: “We treat CAC like an expense, but it acts like an asset.
Traditional CapEx | Tech CAC |
Capitalized | Expensed |
Asset-backed loans | Funded by equity |
Predictable ROI | Often ignored |
Introducing EBITCAC
EBITCAC = Profit + CAC
Reflects true growth profitability
Example SaaS Company:
- Revenue: $100
- Gross Margin: 70%
- S&M (incl. CAC): 40%
- EBITDA: –20%
But ➕ add CAC back → EBITCAC = +10–20%
EBITCAC gives:
- Real ROI visibility
- Better capital efficiency
- Justifies ongoing spend
Two-Company Framework
Think of a tech business as two entities:
- CAC Machine – Invests in marketing, brings new customers with predictable ROI
- Operating Company – Develops product & platform, funded by LTV residuals
“Remove CAC, and most tech companies are cash-generative.”
Capital Misallocation
Current problem:
- Equity used to fund CAC
- Debt doesn’t isolate CAC risk
- P&L optimization stifles growth
Result:
- Underspending on high-ROI CAC
- Lower RoE
- Missed scale potential
The Fix: Capital Stack Innovation
EBITCAC enables structured CAC financing
CAC = an underwritable, recurring asset
Should be financed like CapEx: with purpose-built, risk-isolated capital
Equity = Platform + R&D
CAC = Financed by structured CAC capital (revenue-based financing, etc.)
Market Potential
Cloud 100 companies:
- $12B/year on CAC
- If financed smartly:
- Free up capital
- Fund M&A, buybacks, innovation
$12B excess reinvestment potential
“Imagine the DPI if CAC capital came back to shareholders.”
DPI in this context refers to Distributions to Paid-In capital, a key metric in private equity and venture capital used to measure how much money has been returned to investors relative to how much they originally invested.
if companies free up capital tied in CAC and return it earlier to investors (e.g., via buybacks or secondary sales), it would:
- Improve DPI
- Give liquidity without needing an IPO or acquisition
- Reduce dependency on market timing
Conclusion
Switch to EBITCAC:
- Reveals true profit engine
- Frees cash for growth
- Enables better capital structuring
Ask not: “What’s our EBITDA?”
Ask: “What’s our ROI on CAC?”